[189466] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Global/distributed IXP operators?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marty Strong via NANOG)
Sun May 29 08:32:24 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <230732850.196.1464524787663.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 13:32:18 +0100
To: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net>
From: Marty Strong via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: Marty Strong <marty@cloudflare.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I think he means IXes like NetIX: http://netix.net/map, a single =
distributed fabric.
Regards,
Marty Strong
--------------------------------------
CloudFlare - AS13335
Network Engineer
marty@cloudflare.com
+44 7584 906 055
smartflare (Skype)
http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=3D13335
> On 29 May 2016, at 13:26, Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net> wrote:
>=20
> Could you define what you mean by a distributed\global IXP? There are =
plenty of IXPs, but there aren't really global IXPs, those just become =
networks.=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -----=20
> Mike Hammett=20
> Intelligent Computing Solutions=20
> http://www.ics-il.com=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Midwest Internet Exchange=20
> http://www.midwest-ix.com=20
>=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
>=20
> From: "Daniel Rohan" <drohan@gmail.com>=20
> To: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>=20
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 12:47:07 PM=20
> Subject: Global/distributed IXP operators?=20
>=20
> If there are any operators working at distributed/global IXPs and =
wouldn't=20
> mind having their brains picked regarding design questions, would you =
make=20
> yourselves known to me (on or off-list is fine).=20
>=20
> Thanks,=20
>=20
> Dan=20
>=20
