[189374] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Residential Deployment Survey
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
Mon May 23 10:47:41 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 16:47:31 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>,
=?UTF-8?B?QmrDuHJu?= Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaYs+vKfn3TW-LC9eztEjSFrgAJ6PN=wvqsemuF36s=s+g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Cc: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
This is done so if you are part of a trial can keep answering. Otherwise, n=
o sense to keep going, I guess =E2=80=A6
In other words, if you don=E2=80=99t offer IPv6 you must not answer to the survey=
=E2=80=A6
Saludos,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> en nombre de Christopher Morrow <morrow=
c.lists@gmail.com>
Responder a: <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Fecha: lunes, 23 de mayo de 2016, 16:15
Para: Bj=C3=B8rn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
CC: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Asunto: Re: IPv6 Residential Deployment Survey
>On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Christopher Morrow <
>morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Bj=C3=B8rn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:
>>
>>> Got as far as the second page, where I was met by the question
>>>
>>> "What technology is used for the customer link ?
>>> Choose one of the following answers "
>>>
>>> Come on... One technology per ISP? In what world is that?
>>>
>>>
>> =E2=80=8Bisn't this one answer stream per individual? so YOUR link at YOUR hom=
e is
>> X-type.
>> YOUR link at YOUR office/coffee-shop could be Y-type.
>>
>> you just need to answer the survey a few times...=E2=80=8B
>>
>>
>
>=E2=80=8Bha! sorry... question 3:
>=E2=80=8BPre-commercial/Commercial Service
>Is IPv6 already part of your commercial service ?
>
>"no"
>
>and question 4 is: "What ipv6 configuraiton for your WAN link?"
>
>err.. I said no to the previous question...
>
