[18923] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BBN/GTEI
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Rand)
Sat Aug 22 10:21:41 1998
From: dlr@bungi.com (Dave Rand)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 07:14:08 PDT
In-Reply-To: Bruce Hahne's message on Aug 21, 23:20.
To: Bruce Hahne <hahne@netcom.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Cc: michael@memra.com
[In the message entitled "Re: BBN/GTEI" on Aug 21, 23:20, Bruce Hahne writes:]
> >On-net facilities have made distance-sensitive pricing in most metro areas a
> >thing of the past. Sub $0.04 per DS0-mile long-haul rates have made long
> >haul circuits very affordable. High speed WDM dark fiber routes will make
> >long haul very, very cheap in the next 2 years.
>
> This is the old "bandwidth is so cheap that it's free" argument. True,
> bandwidth is now inexpensive enough for a single DS0 that it's becoming
> counterproductive, from a marketing standpoint, for the telco to attempt to
> differentiate based on distance for a voice call. But if we're ever to
> arrive at the day when I can turn on my 100Mbps video-over-IP feed to my
> home PC over my FTTH connection, and expect to actually get reasonable
> performance, we're probably going to need both metering and inter-provider
> settlements.
>
What I said was "distance-sensitive pricing in most metro areas" is
not a market reality.
Billing for bandwidth used is a good thing. Billing for
packet-flow-ds0-miles-per-aardvark is madness.
Figure out what your costs are, and bill your customers appropriately.
A customer in Borneo is going to have to pay more that a customer
in Borneo, Idaho, who may have to pay more than a customer in Dallas,
who may have to pay more than a customer in New York. Large metro
areas have economies of scale that make very high speed pipes available.
--
Dave Rand
dlr@bungi.com
http://www.bungi.com
