[189137] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri May 6 14:02:32 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: amuse <nanog-amuse@foofus.com>, Mel Beckman <mel@beckman.org>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 20:02:18 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAH9HpnxcWu0-vUXOhM9K=2y6Y0jXSFwONmRvyrVtRcBNRONCPg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 6/May/16 18:59, amuse wrote:
> One question I have is: Is there any reason to believe that the source
> code for Sonicwall, Cisco, etc are any better than the PFSense code? Or
> are we just able to see the PFSense code and make unfounded assumptions
> that the commercial code is in better shape?
A fair question.
And I suppose one could say that if you are unhappy with the code, make
a contribution to make it better.
We have ran them for years, and while no system is without problems, for
the amount of value you receive, I can't really complain.
Mark.
