[189133] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (amuse)
Fri May 6 11:44:54 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <0da23fa4-f5e1-983e-ca4c-91234b7e2b64@seacom.mu>
From: amuse <nanog-amuse@foofus.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 08:44:10 -0700
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
+1 to a "Can you substantiate that claim please?" sentiment here. I've
used it for years and found it to be reliable, flexible, feature-filled.
And having the BSD CLI fully available has been a godsend.
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/May/16 02:18, g@1337.io wrote:
>
> > If you are considering pfSense, I would urge you to look at OPNsense
> > instead. The pfSense code is horrible!
>
> Can you explain?
>
> We've been reasonably happy with it, running it since 2012 on dozens of
> boxes for our corporate network and as OpenVPN servers.
>
> Mark.
>
