[189084] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Tue May 3 16:34:59 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
X-Really-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <D521F7D6D2FA354D80F0D6AB960949F707251B11@N10OS2CE14CN1.N10.tconet.net>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 16:31:53 -0400
To: Gustav Ulander <gustav.ulander@telecomputing.se>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Gustav Ulander
<gustav.ulander@telecomputing.se> wrote:
> Yes I can confirm that we also had the issue with the asr1001s.
> For us the router was fine until we upgraded it. When
> we rebooted it after the upgrade it ran out of memory
> when populating 2 full feeds.
> When we contacted TAC they confirmed that indeed
> it was a memory problem and that we would need to
> add more memory to the box.
Hi Gustav,
IMO, you should not accept that answer from the TAC. An IOS release
that crashes with two 600k BGP feeds in 4 gigs of RAM is badly
defective.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
