[189030] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Superfluous advertisement (was: Friday's Random Comment)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun May 1 13:06:23 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <f73d5780e3524ea1b57e33b53be0d768@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 13:06:16 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1462122376_2415P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:10:44 -0000, "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" said:
> A use case for a longer prefix with the same nexthop:
>
> F
> / \
> D E
> | |
> B C
> \ /
> A
Am I the only one thinking "RFC4264" here? :)
--==_Exmh_1462122376_2415P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=yP8G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1462122376_2415P--
