[189026] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Standards for last mile performance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Sun May 1 05:01:02 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 10:58:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAC6=tfb+YKzU9ZXCNtgWZxpqxXoobw8X6s9gnhAKWcSmuG2VcA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 1/May/16 10:55, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power,
> cabinet wear and tear, more battery banks, chargers, etc). You also
> end up using far, far less fiber strands.
>
I tend to disagree, but this is one of those debates that could go on
forever...
Lord knows I've been having it since 2008.
Mark.
