[188985] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: contact with mail support for domain cisco.com

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hugo Slabbert)
Thu Apr 28 11:37:09 2016

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:37:04 -0700
From: Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com>
To: Piotr <piotr.1234@interia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <0539596b-7365-c0b4-34f4-8d2cf86a43ef@interia.pl>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


--A6N2fC+uXW/VQSAv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu 2016-Apr-28 09:48:09 +0200, Piotr <piotr.1234@interia.pl> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>There is a problem with sending emails from employees in @cisco.com=20
>domain to some certain domain. Emails in opposite direction pass=20
>without problem. No errors, warnings or any other logs at cisco's=20
>employees desktop.. We checked popular rbls, spamhauses, senderbase=20
>etc. Other domains on the same MX cluster receive emails from=20
>@cisco.com..
>
>I try to get help in many ways ( cisco tac, a few  account managers,=20
>channel partners) but without success..
>
>Big thanks for contact via email:   peter.handke.1966 at gmail.com
>or any other advice

You've given us damn near zero information to go on.  Are you with Cisco? =
=20
Or managing some of these "certain domains" to which cisco.com addresses=20
cannot send?  It sounds like the latter and that seems more plausible as=20
I'd be pretty surprised to find a cisco.com postmaster sending a vague=20
request like this to nanog.  I don't really get how TAC would be involved;=
=20
have you tried postmaster@cisco.com?  Assuming that you *are* the receiving=
=20
side, what logs do you have on this?  What are the names of these "certain=
=20
domains"?  Are they all under the same administrative control / same MXs=20
(I'm assuming yes)?

This also seems like something for mailop[1] rather than nanog.  Fair=20
warning; they're using Let's Encrypt and are having trouble with the=20
rollover, so the cert's expired again.

>best regards,
>Peter

--=20
Hugo Slabbert       | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo@slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E   | also on Signal

[1] https://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop

--A6N2fC+uXW/VQSAv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=8wBJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--A6N2fC+uXW/VQSAv--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post