[188844] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: phone fun,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Kuhnke)
Mon Apr 18 13:14:01 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20160418140652.GA73644@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:11:57 -0700
From: Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
This makes me wonder what the 'market value' of a 212 DID is. I have seen
them anywhere from $55 to $600 from providers specifically saying "buy this
DID and port it out to your carrier of choice".
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> wrote:
> In a message written on Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 09:49:37AM +0100,
> tim@pelican.org wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, does anyone have a good pointer to the history of how
> / why US mobile ended up in the same numbering plan as fixed-line?
>
> The other answers address the history here better than I ever good, but
> I wanted to point out one example I hadn't seen mentioned.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_code_917
>
> 917 was originally a mobile only area code overlay in New York City.
> For reasons that are unclear to me, after that experiement it was
> decided that the US would never do that again.
>
> --
> Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org
> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
>
