[188550] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Some doubts on large scale BGP/AS design and black hole routing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Apr 4 10:12:55 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <BLU437-SMTP85A3B1B9E8500B0E39C1E3B09D0@phx.gbl>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:12:51 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: "magicboiz@hotmail.com" <magicboiz@hotmail.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:29 AM, magicboiz@hotmail.com <magicboiz@hotmail.co=
m
> wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> thanks everyone for your replies.
>
> I'd like to highlight this concept that Christopher gave before:
>
> =E2=80=8B"different providers, different entrance facilities in the build=
ing(s),
> different conduits out of the area... "
>
> How can we get this in this world where everyone is moving to big Data
> Center / Colo-Hosters.....In this kind of colo providers, you usually hav=
e
> a Meet-Me-Room or similar (which is a single point of failure) and no
> control on how you're actually connected with your peers....
>
>
=E2=80=8Byou mean: "My pop1 is equinix ashburn DC2, my pop2 is equinix SVL1=
" ?
I believe there are separate entrance facilities available at this sort of
facility (or that'd certainly be on my RFP if I were looking) and you can
sort out with the providers local fiber routing issues by asking for their
maps. =E2=80=8B
