[188387] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CALEA Requirements
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Haylock)
Sun Mar 20 10:45:35 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20160314135756.5CE29921@m0087793.ppops.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:20:40 -0700
From: Robert Haylock <robert.haylock@gmail.com>
To: surfer@mauigateway.com
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
If you are a wireline ISP, start with the ATIS-1000013* docs, you will see
from the FBI link below, different services and carrier types (e.g. voice
or cable) have additional needs on top of this.
As Scott said, your legal/regulatory team needs to guide you to exactly
which in the listMAY apply in your situation, but from a technical point of
view you can at least get an idea about what you might have to do by
starting with the ATIS specs:
https://askcalea.fbi.gov/standards.html
Rob
On 14 March 2016 at 13:57, Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
>
>
> --- lorell@hathcock.org wrote:
> From: "Lorell Hathcock" <lorell@hathcock.org>
>
> Can someone point me to the current CALEA requirements?
>
> As an ISP, should I be recording all internet traffic that passes my
> routers? Or do I only have to record when and if I receive a court order?
>
> I'm not under any court order now, I just want to be sure that I am
> compliant going forward in my capabilities.
> -----------------------------------------
>
>
> This is something your company's lawyers should hash out.
> That said, you shouldn't record anything unless forced to
> do so. It'll just make pervasive surveillance easier.
>
> scott
>
