[188378] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sat Mar 19 20:12:43 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <fe4a793a6e694c50af7d08ff7043fa30@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:12:32 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1458432752_2490P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:29:44 -0000, "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" said:
> A single bit error will drop a whole packet.
> Larger packets will cause more loss. Cables will need to be
> shorter or bitrates lower to compensate.
If that's an actual concern in your production network, you probably have
bigger issues you need to be dealing with....
--==_Exmh_1458432752_2490P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iQIVAwUBVu3q8AdmEQWDXROgAQJ/VhAAuppdkIo+c1P2l46guHlH8WsY0y3gBFSJ
INEhvhIKcA0HfiZkV7izGXnovswnyjtBNYQHTDcCxlWpSPP9wkTs6v4yVIwedFlG
GJqgaPY/IpGmY/tJ34+v41THh5xHRcwLnN/GfZ3s54CQ3Wb2LwdCdLx4N9CvFDbk
tRv4yglrQca6Ddy/Ll72Y+SRWpCckjuYp70XVBeKKd4Kwt0vKiRrmCcxxUidaMhh
kEarZuV7k089qGuuwRBVJv5mejMAtbQ1eAiMBVKjGe3z/y6ZDQnEwWZP41V7R7/G
RXEHiayjPUCyWlUhJmBKvhyR1J08s0zTY92VdE/GJVQXm3CuXQGbLF2/7u7+m3ai
3rD+Z0iiDfxvodK0elzmoQqVqT3mT/BCEhC6Po56+RTqmWdf0BvedFVnje4nwrrc
6JD+JadO6AZuGKLjhVjNehV3O+U+XLI6RqDT4m24JsH6Ii1F4zIm/qP0W41BfEG2
pnHT7K7xkr8AcJlQYLPyj3aFwjjQaYm/im0zJKOie9aynoV8iwEmCrjH5OTqxmFn
ZTs7815COcbKle8uXPlbvCmFSsp7YV8xC/h2F5Bn2VlToVu+QCkvC8XhPeY6A+z0
C4nBL7nv+NwK2dE6YxV7d9ZvrtkP3g/zEyrrAv/qgWswLVFJxSeuwxrK/4MQeu6o
wS+WTsM1njs=
=Y/z+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1458432752_2490P--
