[188278] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper MX Sizing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Colton Conor)
Mon Mar 14 08:35:12 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <88ec265f-9df6-2bf0-fe18-5fb48a2b63ff@seacom.mu>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:35:09 -0500
From: Colton Conor <colton.conor@gmail.com>
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Mark,
You are right that makes sense. So as a recap, you were seeing about 45
seconds route convergence time using RE-S-1800x4 w/ 16GB RAM. For a MX104
it took 4min 25sec. I assume a MX80 would be even slower than an MX104.
What about a MX480 with RE-2000's with 4GB of ram? Does anyone have any
stats on that? I would assume faster than a MX104 but slower than the
RE-S-1800x4
w/ 16GB RAM.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
>
>
> On 14/Mar/16 04:02, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> > Brad,
> >
> > Did you ever get the numbers for the MX480?
>
> I would not expect a difference in performance for the MX480 vis a vis
> the MX960 using the same RE's, MPC's and SCB's.
>
> Mark.
>
>
