[188036] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPV6 planning
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sat Mar 5 16:55:09 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <f29836b7-3c60-452e-bd8d-6289f39e2a1f@seacom.mu>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:54:58 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1457214897_3921P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 23:46:59 +0200, Mark Tinka said:
> If you want IPv6 DNS resolvers, DHCPv6 is a good option, which means a
> hybrid of DHCPv6 and SLAAC is reasonable.
And note that there isn't any problem with a machine getting an IPv6 address
via SLAAC *and* getting another one via DHCPv6 - my laptop is doing that as I
type (plus a privacy address or two as well).
--==_Exmh_1457214897_3921P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=fRAb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1457214897_3921P--
