[188006] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter Phaal)
Wed Mar 2 12:25:29 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Peter Phaal <peter.phaal@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a0776ccc-faba-af55-e5fc-bdd3f6e52251@seacom.mu>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:25:24 -0800
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
>=20
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 10:12 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
>> On 2/Mar/16 08:04, Mark Tinka wrote:
>>=20
>> We were initially looking at at the Nexus 9000, but then moved to the
>> 7700 because the Broadcom chip on the 7700 cannot do single flows larger
>> than 40Gbps on the 100Gbps ports.
>=20
> The Broadcom chip on the 9000, I meant...
>=20
> Mark.
The Nexus 3200 should work well with 100G flows - I believe it's based on th=
e latest Broadcom Tomahawk ASIC. The older Trident II ASICs in the Nexus 9k a=
re 40g parts=
