[187971] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Bass)
Tue Mar 1 09:37:18 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: David Bass <davidbass570@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <16b44ec3-58e8-f014-f99f-434951ae6165@seacom.mu>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:37:13 -0500
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>,
Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I don't agree with that statement (about rare to find big companies using Ne=
xus). If you want 10 gig/40 gig (or 100 gig soon) your options are Cisco Ne=
xus/Arista/Juniper QFX...some periphery devices as well, but the majority us=
e one of those 3.=20
The merchant silicon based switches are pretty reasonably priced too.=20
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 9:24 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
>> On 1/Mar/16 09:44, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
>> But unfortunately they (Cisco Nexus) are pretty expensive and fairly
>> new for DC and ISP market. It's pretty rare to find big company with
>> switching backbone on Nexus switches.
>=20
> As opposed to?
>=20
> We are looking at the Nexus 7700 for 100Gbps core switching.
>=20
> Mark.
