[187966] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pavel Odintsov)
Tue Mar 1 02:44:09 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <56D41A5C.70907@nvcube.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:44:06 +0300
From: Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>
To: Nikolay Shopik <shopik+lists@nvcube.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Yep, Broadcom doing thing right way! :)
But unfortunately they (Cisco Nexus) are pretty expensive and fairly
new for DC and ISP market. It's pretty rare to find big company with
switching backbone on Nexus switches.
But I like this direction of switch silicom unification :) Focus moved
from "network brands" with Not Invented Here syndrome to enough smart
agnostic hardware vendors.
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Nikolay Shopik <shopik+lists@nvcube.net> wrote:
> Cisco Nexus switches support sflow, since they are broadcom based.
>
> On 29/02/16 10:26, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
>> Cisco do not support this protocol at all (that's pretty weird,
>> really).
--
Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
