[187943] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Mon Feb 29 08:12:27 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:11:18 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <A848D452-FCE3-42A4-B80F-0A38BD2C0AF2@arbor.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Roland Dobbins wrote:
> Inconsistent stats, lack of ifindex information.
I've not yet come across an sflow implementation which didn't fill out
the ifindex field. No doubt they exist.
Not sure what you mean by "inconsistent stats".
Nick