[187940] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Edward Dore)
Mon Feb 29 07:55:38 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Edward Dore <edward.dore@freethought-internet.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CALgsdbdirxbJ4-WONoO+eh38xSiQXtdu-wu5abGq+42c9HpPug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:55:33 +0000
To: Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--Apple-Mail=_B8CF6D9A-0245-425B-8FF1-0C99A7E76F88
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
> On 29 Feb 2016, at 12:37, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> Hello!
>=20
> Nice information. Very interesting architecture. They are using L3 on
> IX? How big Juniper Lan in comparison with Extreme lan?
Hi Pavel,
The Juniper LAN is VPLS and the Extreme LAN is standard layer 2 with =
EAPS instead of *STP.
The Juniper LAN peaks at ~2.7Tbps (https://stats.linx.net/lans#lon1), =
whilst the Extreme LAN peaks at ~0.6Tbps =
(https://stats.linx.net/lans#lon2).
Edward Dore
Freethought Internet
--Apple-Mail=_B8CF6D9A-0245-425B-8FF1-0C99A7E76F88
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJW1D/FAAoJEFfvlfdgJz0QzDYH/28R9gR3Yd3lkQJugfpbiNc3
oTcMxggmrY72m+p+HSLqr4fofzGHu4LWamGPFWLlAFP41kmy3MV6kwhbHo863gS+
NWJ016k3Yll3M2Lvec3dOfc9M5OVUsA21TF4NLgphLu0e+5WP4zh0LyGqvXzV4jT
y/iUjk87kwE4FIoU7W6gKy1QcP4De0hvwXv7r5fNEdkgYNEoqE6HsBOnyLkUzp8q
Xn9VfZbumEnl/5nK80qKCIDcUiY/9UqkixXSqOfAwfwnHnI68APwxFM2Wj1uqYLe
7RBdpVEITiu8qWzxz/OpFi2RKlkuof+iRmfkBjB+MWA7bWMxOk5yUXXoV0lHHfA=
=KthL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_B8CF6D9A-0245-425B-8FF1-0C99A7E76F88--
