[187938] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pavel Odintsov)
Mon Feb 29 07:37:59 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <58FE72C0-DA61-496D-8442-FBB5D830CF77@freethought-internet.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:37:56 +0300
From: Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>
To: Edward Dore <edward.dore@freethought-internet.co.uk>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hello!
Nice information. Very interesting architecture. They are using L3 on
IX? How big Juniper Lan in comparison with Extreme lan?
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Edward Dore
<edward.dore@freethought-internet.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 29 Feb 2016, at 09:59, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> For example, at huge Internet Exchanges you actually haven't any
>> netflow enabled devices (just check design architecures from AMX-IX,
>> DEC-IX, LINX or even MSK-IX).
>
>
> LINX use IPFIX (which is derived from NetFlow) for the Juniper LAN.
>
> The Extreme LAN uses sFlow.
>
> Edward Dore
> Freethought Internet
--
Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
