[187894] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Sun Feb 28 01:14:28 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, David Bass <davidbass570@gmail.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:13:41 +0200
In-Reply-To: <56B1B32E.4030609@foobar.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 3/Feb/16 09:58, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Typically the features that fall by the wayside first are: reasonable
> port buffers, qos knobs and decent lag/ecmp hashing support for mpls
> packets.
Cisco, in general, are suffering here, i.e., QoS on LAG's.
IOS, IOS XE and IOS XR suffer massively.
We find that Junos does a better job here.
Mark.
