[187638] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Todd Underwood)
Wed Feb 17 12:29:38 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAJL_ZMMHgoZS-MfVXpK5FxG-eAhkSoKy9ASkkjTJCzsujFMqkg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Todd Underwood <toddunder@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:29:15 -0500
To: jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
let me try to be more concrete and helpful:
lots of people who work at google *and* at cogent are on this list.
none of them are doing anything to look at anything right now b/c
there are no facts in evidence yet.
if you want help with something or want to verify something, provide a
time, a date, a path, a fact, a traceroute, a flow, a log entry a
clue.
cheers,
t
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:54 AM, jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com> wrote:
> They haven't been since at least the mid 90's :)
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
>>
>> Todd Underwood wrote:
>> > Can you scope "issue" with any facts or data?
>>
>> are facts or data strictly necessary on the nanog mailing list?
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> > T
>> > On Feb 17, 2016 11:16, "Fred Hollis" <fred@web2objects.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Anyone else aware of it?
>> >>
>>
>
