[187497] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=a9r=c3=b4me_Nicolle)
Tue Feb 2 18:56:24 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Colton Conor <colton.conor@gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=a9r=c3=b4me_Nicolle?= <jerome@ceriz.fr>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 00:50:26 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAMDdSzNmW0f0+gKQQOSwM4Tjo92HnByc0m--8gZBsfbyUsHufg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Le 02/02/2016 23:38, Colton Conor a écrit :
> We use some of the 7360's, but not the Mikrotik. Why not use ALU's CPE
> devices if using the 7360?
I'd use ALU's ONTs (there's now a SFP GPON stick available too) or RGWs
on the client side, the Mikrotik here is the PE router, because ALU's
FANT-F card lacks EoMPLS/ATOM/VPLS/E-VPN capabilities. I only use QinQ
on its 4*10Gbps uplink ports.
Any 80Gbps capable PE router would be fine, though. I choose the
Mikrotik CRR1072 for its price and density.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
