[18748] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BBN Peering issues
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Denninger)
Sun Aug 16 15:31:59 1998
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 14:17:52 -0500
From: Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.net>
To: Goldstein_William@bns.att.com
Cc: mark@exodus.net, shields@crosslink.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <H00003e4027c49b1@MHS>; from Goldstein_William@bns.att.com on Sun, Aug 16, 1998 at 02:58:19PM -0400
Yep.
What comes with this is that Exodus and the rest of the world have the
freedom to inform our customers and the public in general of (1) what we
ascertain the situation to be, (2) how we analyze it, and (3) what we
recommend that customers of both Exodus and BBN do in response.
Whether the rest of you like it or not.
--
--
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
| NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost
On Sun, Aug 16, 1998 at 02:58:19PM -0400, Goldstein_William@bns.att.com wrote:
> Thanks for the reality check. Whether the rest of us like it or not,
> you're right.
>
> Bill Goldstein
> Senior Internet Specialist
> AT&T
> wgoldstein@att.com
> TEL:(412)642-7288
>
> ----------
> From: shields
> Sent: Sunday, August 16, 1998 3:59 AM
> To: mark
> Cc: shields; nanog
> Subject: Re: BBN Peering issues
>
> > fundamentally important that these ideals be extended to the future
> of
> > the Internet, if it is to have a future. No company should have the
> > right to force another to pay for connectivity simply because the
> latter
> > has not been around since the beginning or they are not a telco.
>
> BBN is answerable to their customers and shareholders and not to your
> or my ideals of how the Internet should work.
> --
> Shields, CrossLink.
> <<File: Re_ BBN Peering issues.TXT>>
>
>
