[187443] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dear Windstream engineers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (joel jaeggli)
Mon Feb 1 01:19:29 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "Matthew D. Hardeman" <mhardeman@ipifony.com>,
George Skorup <george@cbcast.com>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:17:39 -0800
In-Reply-To: <005C3894-72C9-4B38-81A2-76235BE9A8B4@ipifony.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--ei6ddbdeWLedjRlURumuO9ignRnX3Hpa4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 1/30/16 2:29 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman wrote:
> You offer this service to your customers, don=E2=80=99t you? ;-)
source based RTBH requires urpf, which while generally available may
have practical limitations on implementation.
> Seriously, it=E2=80=99s a good question. Most IP transit providers off=
ering BGP services do offer RTBH.
>=20
>> On Jan 29, 2016, at 10:51 PM, George Skorup <george@cbcast.com> wrote:=
>>
>> Why doesn't Windstream have RTBH for their BGP customers? It cannot be=
impossible to implement.
>=20
--ei6ddbdeWLedjRlURumuO9ignRnX3Hpa4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iEYEARECAAYFAlau+IMACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrLVEACeJskD8pb2jGE2KH1pIGiXzlMB
894Ani7k2+yJhp8/a2iRiL1laThs4iSe
=alnN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ei6ddbdeWLedjRlURumuO9ignRnX3Hpa4--
