[187408] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Thu Jan 28 18:26:16 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
X-Really-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <m28u39akcj.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:25:47 -0500
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> folk can rant on nanog all they want if it
> makes them feel good or self-righteous.
Hi Randy,
It DOES make me feel good. And a little self-righteous.
> won't change a damned thing.
Some FCC employees read this forum. My impression is that they're not
terribly far from concluding that closed peering policies are
anti-competitive. When I have such impressions I'm usually off by
years. Still, it would be nice if just once an industry cleaned itself
up -before- regulators forced the issue.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
