[187281] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin Wilson)
Tue Jan 26 07:45:20 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Justin Wilson <lists@mtin.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:45:15 -0500
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <887B1D5C-9901-4EEC-9442-10FAB7E8D106@puck.nether.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
=46rom an IX perspective HE is much more receptive to peering at an IX. =
Last I knew cogent outright says no. In our Indianapolis market a ton =
of capacity would be saved if Cogent would peer. I understand the =
reasoning, but having a provider that is more willing to peer is a draw =
to the end user networks we work with.
Justin Wilson
j2sw@mtin.net
---
http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO
xISP Solutions- Consulting =E2=80=93 Data Centers - Bandwidth
http://www.midwest-ix.com=20
Internet Exchange - Peering=20
