[187200] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Butterworth)
Fri Jan 22 07:30:16 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:28:01 GMT
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk>
To: brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk, owen@delong.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> From owen@delong.com Fri Jan 22 10:25:26 2016
> However, I think your description of the scenario is rather
> heavily skewed
Most posts are bashing Cogent so it's bad of me to say they are equally
free to do whatever they want with their network? Mob rule...
I favour neither side. Nobody has to buy from either of them.
> especially when you consider that Cogent is basically the only
> remaining major (I find it hard to call them a tier 1 given
> their behavior) provider that still refuses SFI of any form
> with HE.
tier 1 seems consistent with Cogents refusal.
brandon
