[187121] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICYMI: FBI looking into LA fiber cuts, Super Bowl
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Whyte)
Wed Jan 20 11:42:18 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund@medline.com>, "nanog@nanog.org"
<nanog@nanog.org>
From: Scott Whyte <swhyte@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 08:41:48 -0800
In-Reply-To: <9578293AE169674F9A048B2BC9A081B401C9BCDD29@MUNPRDMBXA1.medline.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 1/20/16 08:25, Naslund, Steve wrote:
> Helicopters near the Super Bowl are cleared to be there and are flown by vetted professional pilots. A human pilot in a helicopter presumably has some kind of qualification to be there while a drone (although I don't like that word) could be flown by any moron with a couple hundred bucks. I also think the government is going completely overboard with the "drone threat" but in the case of the Super Bowl, there should definitely be a reasonable restriction on drone flights, ANY flight for that matter. I think reasonable drone pilots would agree with that.
Can't wait for autonomous drones in the $50 range. And the autonomous
counter-drones.
>
> Steven Naslund
> Chicago IL
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 9:46 AM
> To: Rafael Possamai
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: ICYMI: FBI looking into LA fiber cuts, Super Bowl
>
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:41:31 -0600, Rafael Possamai said:
>> I fail to see how drones relate to fiber cuts and the superbowl. Did
>> the article author just throw that in there? The news helicopter
>> getting aerial footage also poses a risk, so not sure what's special about drones.
> Drones don't cost $200 per hour to keep in the air, and they're not as obvious as a helicopter. So it becomes a lot easier to get in there and grab some unauthorized video....
