[187110] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Wed Jan 20 07:20:43 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <trinity-29af3653-7205-4513-9c8b-32076b2aa151-1453292082537@3capp-mailcom-lxa07>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 07:20:37 -0500
To: nanog-isp@mail.com
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 7:14 AM, nanog-isp@mail.com wrote:
>=20
> Hello all,
>=20
> Would those with IPv6 deployments kindly share some statistics on =
their percentage of IPv6 traffic?
>=20
> Bonus points for sharing top IPv6 sources. Anything else than the =
usual suspects, Google/YouTube, Netflix and Facebook?
>=20
> Some public information I've found so far:
> - Comcast around 25% IPv6 traffic ( =
http://www.lightreading.com/ethernet-ip/ip-protocols-software/facebook-ipv=
6-is-a-real-world-big-deal/a/d-id/718395 )
> - Comcast has over 1 Tb/s (of mostly YouTube traffic) over IPv6 ( =
http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/comcast-reaches-key-milestone-=
in-launch-of-ipv6-broadband-network )
> - Swisscom 26% IPv6 traffic, 60% YouTube ( =
http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog27/p/01_Martin_Gysi.pdf )
>=20
> I'd be very much interested in hearing from smaller ISPs, especially =
those having a very limited number of IPv4 addresses and/or running out.=20=
>=20
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> Jared
^^^^^^^
Not me ;)
I currently see around 56.4:1 with the timing of peaks the same in v4 =
and v6.
I am talking with a few local wireless ISPs in my area that are going to =
be running fiber, they currently provide a NAT44 experience and I=E2=80=99=
m pushing them to deploy IPv6 to preserve their CGN state. This is =
mostly an exercise in them making the time to enable it vs needing =
convincing.
- [another] Jared=
