[18710] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BBN Peering issues
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Bowman)
Fri Aug 14 15:48:22 1998
From: Robert Bowman <rob@elite.exodus.net>
To: smd@clock.org (Sean M. Doran)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 12:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: asr@millburn.net, dorian@blackrose.org, fez@mindspring.net,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <19980813190520Z27200-8968+97@cesium.clock.org> from "Sean M. Doran" at Aug 13, 98 12:05:11 pm
I believe he meant private interconnect.
As you know, Sprint's contracts strictly forbid discussing
interconnection points in any detail by either party.
>
>
> | I checked before doing so, and I checked once again in light of your
> | allegation. And, according to Exodus, this *IS* a PX.
>
> If by PX you mean "public exchange point", then Sprint is
> being unusually inconsistent with its naming, numbering, and
> topology conventions.
>
> I'm curious as to which exchange point it is, if that in fact is
> what PX means.
>
> Of course, whatever type of connection it is, I'm curious about
> the fact that packets are always drawn towards this one connection.
> Are there others? If so, are they down or something?
>
> Sean. (wondering why Sprint would give away a single free T3)
>
