[187064] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: de-peering for security sake
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bzs@theworld.com)
Sun Jan 17 19:24:58 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 19:23:13 -0500
From: bzs@theworld.com
To: Dan Hollis <goemon@sasami.anime.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1601171302390.19094@yuri.anime.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>, bzs@theworld.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On January 17, 2016 at 13:06 goemon@sasami.anime.net (Dan Hollis) wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016, bzs@theworld.com wrote:
> > Sure, you have your hands on BGP etc, so what router commands (hammer)
> > can effect international policy (nail)?
> >
> > This is fundamentally a social and political issue and needs to be
> > dealt with on that level, not with changes in router configs.
>
> bgp blackhole fed by rbl?
>
> at the very least, scavenger queue packets by rbl.
>
> complacency / willful negligence needs to have a monetary cost.
How well is this approach working so far?
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
