[186954] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: GPON vs. GEPON
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Mon Jan 11 08:37:59 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>,
Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:37:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAC6=tfb+BfoMCLSefyRUFGmkS+EBNARN6beRVA=BRpAEb=Lg9A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 9/Jan/16 08:45, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> There's a reason Google did 16 way splits, and yes, we have two paths we
> are looking at for NG-PON2. One with Calix, another with another vendor.
At previous job, we did 24x splits to guarantee 100Mbps to each home; up
to 50Mbps for Internet Access, 26Mbps for two 1080p IPTV HD streams, and
another 24Mbps for margin (which covered VoIP).
At present job, we'll stick with Active-E.
Mark.
