[18691] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BBN Peering issues
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Deepak Jain)
Fri Aug 14 10:46:42 1998
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 14:18:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net>
To: Adam Rothschild <asr@millburn.net>
cc: John Butler <fez@mindspring.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980813103627.28606A-100000@thuule.pair.com>
Uh-cough.
>From nitrous, just one network block:
*>i199.245.183.0 209.185.9.157 2000000000 100 0 3967 i
* 192.41.177.240 7 90 0 1800 1239 3967 i
* i 209.185.9.157 2000000000 100 0 3967 i
* 192.41.177.241 69 100 0 1239 3967 i
It looks like Exodus buys transit from Sprint to me.
-Deepak.
On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Adam Rothschild wrote:
> > Exodus *does* face some hard business decisions. Unfortunately, blaming BBN
> > isn't going to do much to help Exodus. Capitalists trashing capitalism? Please.
>
> It is my understanding that BBN is even hesitant to peer with Exodus
> PUBLICLY. Exodus does not buy transit from anyone, so that would
> result in total inaccessability, no? How would that be in anyone's best
> interest? If anyone knows otherwise, please do speak up.
>
> If this is, indeed, the case, then it really sucks for Exodus, given their
> transit-free nature.
>
>
