[186777] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: TransPacific Partnership
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Hoppes)
Sun Jan 3 19:07:21 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Matt Hoppes <mhoppes@indigowireless.com>
In-Reply-To: <925F280C2DCC9D409D202D3E79C01E12105B0B58@MAIL.connectivityit.com.au>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 19:07:12 -0500
To: Tom Berryman <Tom@connectivityit.com.au>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
My understanding was if it all goes through here in the US as proposed ISPs w=
ould have to provide real time monitoring of data Not as part of CALEA but=
as part of NSA surveilance.=20
> On Jan 3, 2016, at 18:54, Tom Berryman <Tom@connectivityit.com.au> wrote:
>=20
> G'Day Matt,
>=20
> I'm here in Australia - and yes we are all well aware of the "benefits" of=
the TPP.
>=20
> What do you mean by burned?
> As in the additional accounting and administration overhead of doing busin=
ess with operators in TPP participating countries?
>=20
> Also, will you be attending PTC?
>=20
>=20
> Regards,
> Tom Berryman
>=20
>=20
> Tom Berryman | CTO
> Connectivity I.T. PTY LTD
> ABN: 41128650635
>=20
> 1300 22 46 00 (+61356224600) | tom@connectivityit.com.au | AS-58511
> www.connectivityit.com.au | facebook.com/connectivityit | twitter.com/conn=
ectivityit
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
> Sent: Monday, 4 January 2016 10:32 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: TransPacific Partnership
>=20
> Has anyone heard any more regarding the TPP and the proposed additional mo=
nitoring burdens that would be put on ISPs?
