[186759] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: VPLS Providers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Burwell)
Thu Dec 31 20:50:21 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGTqYCWYmk0_4xvjvu_oXJCmHyDgPaLOq5Cp9UAj11eeOQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Burwell <cburwell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:49:58 -0500
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I appreciate the suggestion! That's something to consider if our
requirements expand globally. Right now the focus is N.A., but I threw EMEA
& APAC in there.
I've had enough trouble with broadcast storms and other issues in N.A., so
I don't have much of an appetite for magnifying those issues on a global
scale!
- Chris
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, December 31, 2015, Chris Burwell <cburwell@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi NANOG,
>>
>> I'm looking to solicit feedback on VPLS providers. The requirement is for
>> connectivity among about ten sites in North America, however feedback for
>> providers that also extend service to EMEA and APAC would also be welcome.
>>
>> All types of feedback are appreciated (good, bad, and anything in
>> between).
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Chris
>>
>
> Sorry for the meta suggestion, but i think you would be much happier with
> an L3 vpn. It is a more common offering and avoid transcontinental
> broadcast storms
>
