|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org From: Matt Hoppes <mhoppes@indigowireless.com> In-Reply-To: <CAC6=tfaxmo3_7ze60L0WkYT+dJY0+k8_fzVgPNXHMk+BY7ipiA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 22:16:15 -0500 To: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com> Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org So they are trying to stuff every last bit as an end device modulates up and= down? Or are you saying that's how they determine if they can scale up the resolut= ion "because there is more throughout available now".=20 > On Dec 29, 2015, at 22:10, Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >=20 > Adaptive bandwidth detection. >=20 >> On Dec 29, 2015 8:59 PM, "Matt Hoppes" <mhoppes@indigowireless.com> wrote= : >> Has anyone else observed Netflix sessions attempting to come into custome= r CPE devices at well in excess of the customers throttled plan? >>=20 >> I'm not talking error retries on the line. I'm talking like two to three t= imes in excess of what the customers CPE device can handle. >>=20 >> I'm observing massive buffer overruns in some of our switches that appear= to be directly related to this. And I can't figure out what possible good p= urpose Netflix would have for attempting to do this. >>=20 >> Curious if anyone else has seen it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |