[186655] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Broadband Router Comparisons
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Dec 27 03:19:39 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1512270830440.29581@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 03:19:26 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1451204366_10192P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 08:37:25 +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson said:
> If someone like Consumer Reports or similar agency started testing and
> rating devices on these things like long-time support, automatic updates,
> software quality etc, and not just testing wifi speed as a factor of
> distance, we might get somewhere.
As finally we come full circle to the original question "who, if anybody,
has a list of which things are crap and which aren't" :)
--==_Exmh_1451204366_10192P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=dAMa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1451204366_10192P--
