[186640] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: de-peering for security sake
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Sat Dec 26 16:17:35 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <1E957E27-F8A0-450C-9A51-F497B2EC4155@gt86car.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 16:17:30 -0500
To: Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Dec 25, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk> =
wrote:
>=20
> why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports, =
normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed =
deliberate abuse albeit compromised machines
Biggest reason I=E2=80=99ve seen is the same reason I delete spam in =
Chinese/Japanese/charset that is foreign to me.
When I know I=E2=80=99m supposed to be reading something I toss it into =
google translate, when I don=E2=80=99t expect it, it may not even reach =
my $inbox. I=E2=80=99d expect writing to people in their non-native =
language is more likely to result in things being ignored or =
misclassified[1].
I work for a part of a multinational that doesn=E2=80=99t use the roman =
alphabet and mails are sometimes missed for this reason between our =
groups.
This is far more of a two way street than people realize. When you find =
that person who speaks both languages it can remove hurdles.
- Jared
1 - Think of the setting ok_languages in spamassassin.
