|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1512252250480.29581@uplift.swm.pp.se> Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:54:09 -0500 From: Andrew Kirch <trelane@trelane.net> To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org Speaking as a former DNSBL operator, NANOG has a poor history of dealing with those who report abuse as well. On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Dec 2015, Colin Johnston wrote: > >> why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports, >> normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed deliberate >> abuse albeit compromised machines > > > This is not a chinese problem, this is a general ISP problem. Most ISPs do > not respond to abuse reports. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |