|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 08:18:36 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net> Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> In-Reply-To: <C884B1AA-F3EE-4DD8-95A5-16EA0C101FE3@hammerfiber.com> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org To the thread, not necessarily Daniel, if blocking countries\continents is = a bad thing (not saying I disagree), how do you deal with the flood of tras= h? Just take it on the chin?=20 The degree of splash damage by blocking this way will vary based upon what = kind of network you are. Residential eyeballs? You could probably block mos= t of a lot of things and people wouldn't notice or care, as long as it wasn= 't Google, Facebook, Netflix, etc.=20 -----=20 Mike Hammett=20 Intelligent Computing Solutions=20 http://www.ics-il.com=20 Midwest Internet Exchange=20 http://www.midwest-ix.com=20 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Corbe" <dcorbe@hammerfiber.com>=20 To: "Nick Hilliard" <nick@foobar.org>=20 Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>=20 Sent: Friday, December 25, 2015 8:11:55 AM=20 Subject: Re: de-peering for security sake=20 > On Dec 25, 2015, at 7:14 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:=20 >=20 > Daniel Corbe wrote:=20 >> Let=E2=80=99s just cut off the entirety of the third world instead of ha= ving=20 >> a tangible mitigation plan in place.=20 >=20 > You mean, cut off Sweden, Ireland, Finland, Switzerland and Israel?=20 >=20 >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World=20 >=20 > What an enormously silly idea.=20 >=20 > Seasons greetings to all,=20 >=20 > Nick=20 >=20 It was a stupid idea even before you corrected me.=20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |