[186596] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: de-peering for security sake
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Thu Dec 24 23:40:50 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <C4E2719E-3BFB-4DA0-A3A6-6C9F2F010D85@gt86car.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:40:36 -0800
To: Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
While you have a great deal of control over what prefixes you choose to acce=
pt... You have very little control over your advertised prefixes once they e=
xit your ASN. Maybe your transits offer communities to control their peer ad=
vertisements. In general assuming you're paying for the Internet cone, you h=
ave a vested interest in them propagating everywhere otherwise the party tha=
t is partitioned is you.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 24, 2015, at 15:44, Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk> wrote:
>=20
> see
> http://map.norsecorp.com
>=20
> We really need to ask if China and Russia for that matter will not take ab=
use reports seriously why allow them to network to the internet ?
>=20
> Colin
>=20
>=20