[186593] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: de-peering for security sake
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Dec 24 22:47:18 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <D9BA146E-CD8F-45A2-AD5D-2FA9C2177224@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 19:38:12 -0800
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Yes=E2=80=A6 Isn=E2=80=99t it impressive just how persistent the bad =
idea fairy can be?
Owen
> On Dec 24, 2015, at 19:25 , Suresh Ramasubramanian =
<ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hmm, has anyone at all kept count of the number of times such a =
discussion has started up in just the last year, and how many more times =
in the past 16 or so years?
>=20
> Mind you, back in say 2004, this discussion would have run to 50 or 60 =
emails at a bare minimum, in no time at all.
>=20
> --srs
>=20
> On 25-Dec-2015, at 6:55 AM, Stephen Satchell <list@satchell.net> =
wrote:
>=20
>>> On 12/24/2015 04:50 PM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>>> Let=E2=80=99s just cut off the entirety of the third world instead =
of having
>>> a tangible mitigation plan in place.
>>=20
>> While you thing you are making a snarky response, it would be handy =
for end users to be able to turn on and off access to other countries =
retail.
