[186590] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: de-peering for security sake
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Thu Dec 24 22:25:35 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <567C9AF3.7070207@satchell.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 08:55:24 +0530
To: Stephen Satchell <list@satchell.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hmm, has anyone at all kept count of the number of times such a discussion h=
as started up in just the last year, and how many more times in the past 16 o=
r so years?
Mind you, back in say 2004, this discussion would have run to 50 or 60 email=
s at a bare minimum, in no time at all.
--srs
On 25-Dec-2015, at 6:55 AM, Stephen Satchell <list@satchell.net> wrote:
>> On 12/24/2015 04:50 PM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>> Let=E2=80=99s just cut off the entirety of the third world instead of hav=
ing
>> a tangible mitigation plan in place.
>=20
> While you thing you are making a snarky response, it would be handy for en=
d users to be able to turn on and off access to other countries retail.
