[186569] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: interconnection costs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Dec 23 21:04:39 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Reza Motamedi <motamedi@cs.uoregon.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <CACGuEhHz58T5O6og60iZFCKBXOW0mYa3X9DPaKo_sHU0F-_OOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 21:04:27 -0500
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1450922667_10192P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:39:11 -0800, Reza Motamedi said:
> Aren't availability, guaranteed service and remote hands an incentive to do
> peering inside a third party colocation?
Sure. But there are places in the US where you have to decide whether the
cost of lighting 300 miles of fiber to the colo is worth the benefits, when
the other option is lighting fiber to a street cabinet across town.
--==_Exmh_1450922667_10192P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=mjAA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1450922667_10192P--
