[18652] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BBN Peering issues
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Rothschild)
Thu Aug 13 15:44:30 1998
X-Envelope-To: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 15:08:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Adam Rothschild <asr@millburn.net>
To: "Sean M. Doran" <smd@clock.org>
cc: dorian@blackrose.org, fez@mindspring.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <19980813190520Z27200-8968+97@cesium.clock.org>
On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Sean M. Doran wrote:
> | I checked before doing so, and I checked once again in light of your
> | allegation. And, according to Exodus, this *IS* a PX.
>
> If by PX you mean "public exchange point", then Sprint is
> being unusually inconsistent with its naming, numbering, and
> topology conventions.
PX = Private eXchange (private peering). sorry 'bout any confusion.
> I'm curious as to which exchange point it is, if that in fact is
> what PX means.
>
> Of course, whatever type of connection it is, I'm curious about
> the fact that packets are always drawn towards this one connection.
> Are there others? If so, are they down or something?
>
> Sean. (wondering why Sprint would give away a single free T3)
>
