[186476] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Sat Dec 19 11:23:54 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <841DE17E-F075-491C-BAFE-144E6FFE6A53@steffann.nl>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 11:18:58 -0500
To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I'm preparing some slides on this topic for an upcoming webinar our marketin=
g team has roped me into :-)
I'd love to hear from people on what they perceive and the real barriers the=
y have seen with regards to IPv6 in your environment.=20
I certainly have the list from our IT department. After much effort and unde=
r duress it seems they are making progress and 2016 will be the year it happ=
ens.=20
Jared Mauch
> On Dec 19, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
>=20
>=20
> If the choice is between the IETF having to change standards vs some peopl=
e having to learn something new then sorry, they will have to invest some ti=
me and learn.... IPv4 !=3D IPv6. You have to keep learning, that's part of t=
he job.
