[186474] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CDN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mehmet Akcin)
Sat Dec 19 11:17:00 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net>
In-Reply-To: <7BD153A6-6CFC-49AF-85C5-6B037324226B@ianai.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 08:16:39 -0800
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I don=E2=80=99t think anyone really would tell where their critical =
network assets are but obviously you can guesstimate by looking where =
they have connection points available.
> On Dec 19, 2015, at 8:13 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net> =
wrote:
>=20
> PeeringDB will tell you where they connect. I do not think anyone puts =
stuff into PeeringDB when they have on-net nodes.
>=20
> In general, only the big three (Akamai, Netflix, Google) have =
significant deployments inside eyeball networks. Exceptions to every =
rule and all that, but if you pick random large eyeball network, chances =
are very, very high they have no one other than those three - if they =
have any at all.
>=20
> --=20
> TTFN,
> patrick
>=20
>> On Dec 19, 2015, at 10:35 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net> wrote:
>>=20
>> looking at peeringdb -- http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=3D16509 =
might
>> give you an idea where they are.
>>=20
>> mehmet
>>=20
>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Ahmed Munaf =
<ahmed.dalaali@hrins.net>
>> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Dear All,
>>>=20
>>> Does anyone know if AWS amazon =E2=80=9Ccloudfront=E2=80=9D, cloud =
flare, Microsoft =E2=80=A6 etc,
>>> hosting their servers on other party providers?
>>> just like what GGC and Akamai do by hosting their servers on other =
ISP=E2=80=99s
>>> datacenter!
>>>=20
>>> Regards,
>>>=20
>>>=20
>=20
