[186466] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lee Howard)
Fri Dec 18 22:58:06 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:21:28 -0500
From: Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org>
To: Berry Mobley <berry@gadsdenst.org>, <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151217023407.AE7DE2C060C@mail.nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 12/16/15, 8:53 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Berry Mobley"
<nanog-bounces@nanog.org on behalf of berry@gadsdenst.org> wrote:
>At 08:22 PM 12/16/2015, Randy Bush wrote:
>> > We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.
>>
>>this is the oppress the workers so they will revolt theory. load of
>>crap.
>>
>>make ipv6 easier to deploy, especially in enterprise. repeat the
>>previous sentence 42 times.
>
>This. I'm in an enterprise with some stubborn vendors, and none of
>them are even talking about ipv6. It won't help me to move (and it
>won't help you to get well if you're here) if my users can't get to
>their stuff.
Can you dual-stack while you wait for them?
Can we help you push on those vendors?
Lee
>
>Berry
>
>
